Smt.Pandiammal v. Mr.Ramu

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.02.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR and M.P(MD) No.1 of 2008

1.Pandiammal

2.Raniammal

3.Ramakkal

4.Panchavarnam

5.Annamayil

6.P.Ganesan (6th appellant declared as major and discharged the first appellants from the guardianship vide C.M.P(MD)Nos.8646 and 8647 of 2005)

7.Selvaraj

8.Minor Rajeswari

9.Minor Ramasamy

10.Minor Ramalakshmi ...Appellants (Minor appellants 8 to 10 represented through their father and natural guardian Mr.Selvaraj 7th Appellant herein) -Vs-

1.Ramu

2.Lakshmanan

3.Ramachandran

4.Ponnuthai

5.Mookan

6.Muthumari ... Respondents COMMON PRAYER

: Second Appeals are filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgments and decrees dated 15.06.2004 made in A.S.Nos.145 and 154 of 2001 on the file of Sub Court, Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District, modifying the decree and judgment dated 26.10.1999 made in O.S.No.303 of 1994 on the file of District Munsif Court, Aruppukkottai. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance COMMON JUDGMENT When the second appeals were taken up for hearing on 23.02.2023, the learned counsel for the appellants reported no instructions. Therefore, the Registry was directed to remove the name of the learned counsel for the appellants and post the second appeals under the caption 'for dismissal' by printing the name of the appellants.

¶2Today, when the second appeals are listed under the caption for dismissal by printing the name of the appellants, there is no representation for the appellants. Hence, these Second Appeals are dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

24.02.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No cp To

1.The Sub Court, Aruppukkottai.

¶2The District Munsif Court, Aruppukkottai.

3.The Record Keeper, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. S.SOUNTHAR

, J.

CP

24.02.2023