VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Muthalibu v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 August 2023
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 10587/2011

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition is filed to quash the order dated 09.08.2011 and the consequent notices dated 19.08.2011.

¶2Pending Writ Petition, the third respondent has passed an interim order dated 09.08.2011 and the relevant portion of the order is extracted hereunder: jpUntlfk; mUs;kpF Vlfehj Rthkp jpUf;nfhapYf;F brhe;jkhd ej;jk; ,lk; ej;jk; epythpj;jpl;lj;jpd; nghJ jtWjyhf jdp eghpd; bgahpy; gl;lh tHq;fg;gl;Ls;sjhy; jtWjyhf gl;lh tHq;fg;gl;l ej;jk; g[y vz;.91/5,6,7 kw;Wk; 91/8 cs;s jdp egh;fspd; bgah;fis uj;J bra;Jtpl;L mUs;kpF Vlfehj Rthkp jpUf;nfhtpy;> mjd; eph;thf "

mjpfhhp vd;W gl;lhgjpt[ bra;J mwpf;if mDg;gf; nfl;Lf; "

bfhs;fpnwd;. The claim of the petitioners is that it is the natham lands and the claim of the fifth respondent is that it is the Temple lands.

¶3Therefore, the second respondent shall consider the claim of both the petitioners as well as the fifth respondent and pass orders, after giving sufficient opportunity to all the interested parties. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of four (4) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶4With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

03.08.2023

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Nsr To

1.The District Collector, Madurai District.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai.

4.The Joint Commissioner, H.R and C.E Nethaji Road, Madurai.

5.The Executive Officer, Edakanathaswamy Temple, Thiruvedagam, Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai District.

S.SRIMATHY, J.

Nsr

03.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and M.P.(MD).Nos.3 and 4 of 2011 1.Muthalibu 2.K.M.Veerappan 3.M.Seethalakshmi 4.R.Jeyakumar ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai. 4.The Joint Commissioner, H.R and C.E Nethaji Road, Madurai. 5.The Executive Officer, Edakanathaswamy Temple, Thiruvedagam, Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the order passed by the third respondent in O.Mu.No.08166/2010/C dated 09.08.2011 and the consequent notices issued by the fifth respondent dated 19.08.2011 and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.T.A.Ebenezer For R-1 to R-4 : Mr.R.Ragavendran, Government Advocate. For R-5 : Dr.C.Guhaseelaruban

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.