VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Rev.A.Gibson Johndas v. The District Collector

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 December 2023
Bench
S.M. Subramaniam, V. Lakshminarayanan
Case no.
WA(MD) 539/2012

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W.A.(MD)No.539 of 2012 and W.P.(MD)No.5906 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 & 1 of 2012 W.A.(MD)No.539 of 2012: Rev.A.Gibson Johndas ... Appellant Vs. Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2.The Director General of Police, Chennai.

3.The Inspector of Police, C.B.C.I.D, Tirunelveli. ...Respondents PRAYER: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Pattern Act to set aside the order of this Court in W.P.(MD)No.12475 of 2010 dated 11.04.2012. For Appellant : No Appearance For R1 : Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government Pleader For R2 & R3 : Mr.Veeranthiran Government Advocate W.P.(MD)No.5906 of 2012: J.Yesumani ... Petitioner Vs. Tirunelveli.

2.The Commissioner, Tirunelveli Corporation S.N.High Road,Tirunelveli.6.

3.The Town Planning Officer, Office of Town Planning Authority, Trivandrum Road,Tirunelveli.2.

4.The Crime Branch Criminal Investigation Department (C.B.C.I.D) Palayamkottai,Tirunelveli, Rep.By its Inspector. ...Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the 2nd respondent not to grant any permission to put up construction in the land in T.S.Nos.272, 306 & 307 in Palayamkottai village,Tirunelveli District and in furtherance restraining the 4th respondent in anyway by putting up construction in T.S.Nos.272, 306 & 307 in Palayamkottai village,Tirunelveli District contrary to the Tamil Nadu District Municipality Building Rules ,1972. For Petitioner : No Appearance For R1 & R3 : Mr.S.Shanmugavel

Additional Government Pleader For R4 : Mr.Veeranthiran Government Advocate For R2 : Mr.Aayiram K.Selvakumar COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) When the matters were listed for hearing on 05.12.2023, there was no representation on the side of the appellant as well as the writ petitioner and hence, the matters were directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal' today.

2.Even though these matters are listed under the caption 'for dismissal' today (i.e., 07.12.2023), there is no representation on the side of the the appellant and the writ petitioner. Hence, the present writ appeal and the writ petition are dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

(S.M.S., J.) & (V.L.N., J.)

07.12.2023

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ta To Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2.The Director General of Police, Chennai.

3.The Inspector of Police, C.B.C.I.D, Tirunelveli.

4.The Commissioner, Tirunelveli Corporation S.N.High Road,Tirunelveli.6.

5.The Town Planning Officer, Office of Town Planning Authority, Trivandrum Road,Tirunelveli.2.

6.The Crime Branch Criminal Investigation Department (C.B.C.I.D) Palayamkottai,Tirunelveli, Rep.By its Inspector.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. ta W.A.(MD)No.539 of 2012 and W.P.(MD)No.5906 of 2012

07.12.2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.