VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

P.Murugaiah (Edp-5014) v. The State Government, Rep.By

DISMISSED AS ABATED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 June 2023
Bench
R. Suresh Kumarauthor, K.K. Ramakrishnan
Case no.
WA(MD) 980/2012

Judgment

JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant submits that the appellant is no more and no steps have been taken on behalf of the appellant to bring the legal heirs despite the effort taken by the learned counsel in this regard.

¶2Recording the same, this Writ Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (R.S.K., J.) & (K.K.R.K, J.)

22.06.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No RM To:

1.The Secretary, Transport Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

2.Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd., Tirunelveli.

3.General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd., Tirunelveli.

R.SURESH KUMAR, J. AND

K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J. RM

22.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN and M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2012 P.Murugiah ... Appellant Vs. 1.The State Government, Rep. by its Secretary, Transport Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd., Tirunelveli, Through its Managing Director. 3.Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd., Tirunelveli, Through its General Manager 4.T.Ponsekar Solomon 5.S.Susil Kumar 6.R.Balasingh 7.R.Pani Sundar 8.E.Jeyaseel Thiagaraj 9.T.Jeyagopal 10.D.Samraj Baskar 11.C.Shivaji 12.T.Appasamy 13.T.Sivasankara Narayanan 14.K.Mohan 15.N.Baskar 16.Xavier Thangaraj ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, praying this Court to set aside the order dated 27.09.2012 made in W.P.(MD)No.12090 of 2012 on the file of this Court. For Appellant : Mr.K.R.Laxman For R1 : Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugam Government Advocate For R2 & R3 : Mr.K.Sathiyasingh For RR4, 5, 7 to 13 : No Appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.