- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 October 2023
- Bench
- S.M. Subramaniam, V. Lakshminarayanan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 13397/2011
Judgment
O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.] The order dated 18.03.2004, passed in O.A.No.6780 of 1995, by the Central Administrative Tribunal, is sought to be quashed in this writ petition.
¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner made a submission that the petitioner is no more and more so, the issue raised in this writ petition is relating to alteration of his date of birth.
¶3At this length of time, such claims need not be considered and the learned counsel for the petitioner has also restricted the prayer by stating that the respondents may be directed to settle the terminal and pensionary benefits due to the deceased petitioner, if it is not already settled.
¶4The respondents are directed to settle the terminal and pensionary benefits due to the deceased petitioner, if not already settled, in favour of his spouse / legal heirs by following the procedures as contemplated.
¶5With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
[S.M.S., J.] [V.L.N., J.]
13.10.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :
krk To:
1.The Tahsildar, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District.
2.The Sub Collector, Sivakasi Division, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and V . LAKSHMINARAYANAN , J . krk
13.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN K.Irulandi ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Tahsildar Srivilliputhur Taluk Virudhunagar District 2.The Sub Collector Sivakasi Division Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the order passed by Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.6780 of 1995, dated 18.03.2004, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to treat the petitioner in service till 30.04.2003 and provide all monetary benefits upto 30.04.2003 and pension benefits and all other terminal benefits after 30.04.2003. For Petitioner : Ms.D.Geetha For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.