- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 November 2023
- Bench
- S Justice R. Kalaimathi
- Case no.
- SA(MD) 538/2006
Judgment
J U D G M E N T When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants filed a memo, dated 22.11.2023 stating that the parties to the matter have settled the dispute between themselves amicably.
2.Recording the same, this Second Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
30.11.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Internet::Yes/No To
1.The Principle Subordinate Judge, Dindigul.
2.The District Munsif, Nilakottai.
¶3The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R. KALAIMATHI
,J.
Ns
30.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI 1.P.Kalavathy 2.P.Senthil Kumar 3.P.Rajendra Kumar 4.P.Vijaya Kumar 5.P.Geetha Rani ... Defendants/Respondents/ Appellants -Vs- 1.K.Rajamaniammal 2.K.Muthusamy 3.K.Thirumurugan 4.K.Rathinasamy 5.K.Gopalan 6.K.Veleaswari ... Plaintiffs/Appellants/ Respondents PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree, dated 06.03.2006 made in A.S.No. 399 of 2004 on the file of the Principle Subordinate Judge, Dindigul, reversing the judgment and decree dated 19.07.2004 made in O.S.No.22 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif, Nilakottai. For Appellants : Mr.V.Shathurthi Raja For R1 to R6 : Mr.V.Rajakittu
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.