Ma.M.Muthumalai v. The Tahsildar

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.11.2025 within a time frame to be stipulated by this Court and directing the third respondent to maintain status quo until completion of the enquiry by the first respondent.

¶2With the consent of the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself, dispensing with the notice to the fourth and fifth respondents, as no adverse orders are proposed to be passed against them.

¶3The grievance of the petitioner is that the fifth respondent purchased the land adjacent to the petitioner's property from one Masilamani Nadar vide a registered Sale Deed bearing Document No. Page No. 2 of 5 614/1987. However, the fifth respondent illegally obtained a Natham patta with incorrect measurements exceeding the extent mentioned in the said Sale Deed.

¶4Therefore, the petitioner submitted a representation-cum-petition dated 08.11.2025 to the first respondent seeking appropriate action. However, no action has been taken thereon. Meanwhile, taking advantage of the excess extent, the fifth respondent alienated the same in favour of the fourth respondent. Hence, the petitioner has been constrained to file the present Writ Petition.

¶5The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first and third respondents, on instructions, would submit that the petitioner's representation dated 08.11.2025 would be considered and appropriate orders would be passed by the first respondent within a period of twelve weeks.

¶6Recording the above submission and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation Page No. 3 of 5 dated 08.11.2025 and pass appropriate orders on its merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The first respondent is also directed to provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the fourth and fifth respondents and any other interested parties who may be affected by such decision, before passing any order. There shall be no order as to costs. [K.SURENDER, J.]

24.02.2026 JEN Index : Yes / No To

1.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office - Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli Town, Tirunelveli - 627 001.

2.The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Gangaikondan, Tirunelveli District - 627 352.

3.The Head Surveyor, Tirunelveli Taluk, Tirunelveli District. Page No. 4 of 5 K.SURENDER

, J.

JEN

24.02.2026 Page No. 5 of 5

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER MA.M.Muthumalai ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office - Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli Town, Tirunelveli - 627 001. 2.The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Gangaikondan, Tirunelveli District - 627 352. 3.The Head Surveyor, Tirunelveli Taluk, Tirunelveli District. 4.Subbiah 5.Sembukutty Karaiyalar ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.11.2025, within time frame as fixed by this Court and directing the third respondent to maintain status quo until the disposal of enquiry before the first respondent. Page No. 1 of 5 For Petitioner : Mr.R.Guruchakkravarthy For R1 & R3 : Mr.D.Sadiq Raja Additional Government Pleader For R2 : Mr.A.Kannan *****