- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 11 September 2023
- Bench
- R.Vijayakumar
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 1396/2011
Judgment
O R D E R According to the learned Counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners have passed away long back and their legal heirs have not responded to file an application to prosecute the Writ Petition. Hence, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
11.09.2023 Index : Yes/No (2/2) Internet : Yes/No cmr To
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thanjavur.
2.The Tahsildar, Thanjavur.
W.P(MD)No.1396 of 2011
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR W.P(MD)No.1396 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.3 of 2011 1.Loganathan 2.Boopalan ....Petitioners Vs 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thanjavur. 2.The Tahsildar, Thanjavur. 3.K.Selvi ...Respondents PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, in the nature of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.3699/2010/A5, dated 13.10.2010 issued by the first respondent and to quash the same. For Petitioner :Mr.P.Vinoth for Mr.R.Subramanian For R1 and R2 : Mr.C.Satheesh, Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.K.Kumaravel ***** R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. cmr
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.