- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 March 2023
- Bench
- R. Suresh Kumar, K.K. Ramakrishnan
- Case no.
- WA(MD) 1202/2013
Judgment
J U D G M E N T [Judgment of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is no more and when he contacted, it become impossible for him to get any positive answer from the legal heirs to file necessary petition to bring them on record. Therefore, the learned counsel submits that the writ appeal may be disposed of accordingly.
¶2Recording the above submission of the learned counsel for the appellant, this writ appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.
[R.S.K., J.] [K.K.R.K., J.]
17.03.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :
krk To:
1.The Assistant Director of Medicine, Govt. Head Quarters Hospital, Dindigul, Dindigul District.
2.The Director of Medical Service, Tenampet, Chennai-6. R.SURESH KUMAR , J . and K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN , J . krk
17.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN P.Maruthai Veeran ... Appellant -vs- 1.The Assistant Director of Medicine Govt. Head Quarters Hospital Dindigul, Dindigul District 2.The Director of Medical Service Tenampet, Chennai-6 3.The Accountant General (Accounts & Entitlement) Tamilnadu Office 361, Anna Salai, Chennai ... Respondents Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order, dated 05.10.2012, passed in W.P.(MD) No.14070 of 2010, on the file of this Court. For Appellant : Mr.K.Muthumalai For Respondents : Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugam Government Advocate for R1 & R2 Mr.P.Gunasekaran for R3
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.