- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 July 2023
- Bench
- P.Dhanabal
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 580/2021
Judgment
ORDER Today when the matter was taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner.
2.However, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 represented that the representation of the petitioner dated 06.01.2020 was considered and the same was disposed of on
17.06.2020 itself. The learned Government Advocate has produced the letter of the petitioner by stating that there is no need of further action in this case.
3.In view of the above said submissions, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No Costs.
17.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Mrn To
1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai – 625 001.
2.The Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Cell, Madurai City.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P.DHANABAL,J. Mrn Writ Petition (MD).No.580 of 2021
17.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 17.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL P.Shanthi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai – 625 001. 2.The Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Cell, Madurai City. 3.S.Gowri ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to enquire and pass orders based on the representation of the date 06.01.2020 against the third respondent. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor For 3rd Respondent : Mr.P.Saravanan
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.