The Management v. M.Dhanumoorthi

JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) This Writ Appeal has been directed against the order passed by the learned Judge in W.P.(MD)No.7722 of 2006 dated 09.04.2011.

¶2It is submitted by Mr.K.Mahendran, learned Standing counsel appearing for the appellant Transport Corporation that, the very respondent employee himself has gone for voluntary retirement from service with effect from 31.03.2014, therefore, as of now nothing survives in this Writ Appeal to be agitated. In this context, necessary instructions given by the appellant Corporation dated 29.03.2023 has also been placed before this Court.

¶3Recording the said statement made by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant, as nothing survives to agitate further in this Writ Appeal, this Writ Appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to cost. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (R.S.K., J.) & (K.K.R.K, J.)

10.04.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No SJ

R.SURESH KUMAR, J. AND

K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J. SJ

10.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013 The Management, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Tirunelveli Region, Tirunelveli. ... Appellant/1st Respondent Vs. 1.M.Dhanumoorthi ... 1st Respondent/Petitioner 2.The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Tirunelveli. ... 2nd Respondent/2nd Respondent PRAYER: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, praying this Court to set aside the order dated 09.04.2011 made in W.P.(MD)No.7722 of 2006 on the file of this Court. For Appellant : Mr.K.Mahendran For 1st Respondent : No appearance