- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 25 September 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA(MD) 998/2006
Judgment
J U D G M E N T No representation for the appellant.
¶2Sole appellant died long back. Once the sole appellant died, if steps have not been taken within 90 days, the appeal will be abated automatically.
¶3In this case, till date no steps have been taken and hence, this appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No
25.09.2023 am To
1.The Sub-Court (Appellate Court) Tuticorin.
2.The District Munsif Court, Srivaiguntam.
¶3The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. am
25.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2006 Mariammal ... Appellant Vs. 1.Shanmuga Konar (Died) 2.Pichan ... Respondents 3.Sankarasubbu 4.Esakkiammal (Respondents 3 & 4 are brought on record as Lrs of the deceased first respondent vide Court Order dated 02.02.2022 made in C.M.P(MD)Nos.8627, 8629 and 8630 of 2021) PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.56 of 2004, on the file of the Sub-Court (Appellate Court) Tuticorin dated 20.12.2004 reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.5 of 2002 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Srivaiguntam dated 30.01.2004. For Appellant : No appearance For R2 to R4 : Mr.R.T.Arivukumar
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.