- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 10 October 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 680/2021
Judgment
O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the endorsement so made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
10.10.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg To
1.The District Collector, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sankaran Kovil. Tenkasi District
3.The Tahsildar Thiruvengadam Taluk, Tenkasi District.
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. tsg
10.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH M.G.Ramasamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sankaran Kovil. Tenkasi District 3.The Tahsildar Thiruvengadam Taluk, Tenkasi District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd Respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.07.2019 on the basis of communication send by RDO Tirunelveli (Now 2nd Respondent herein) by proceedings O.Mu.Aa3/3043/2017 dated 09.07.2017. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Subbaraj For R-1 to R-3 : Ms.S.Jeyapriya Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.