Sheik Ameerali v. The Superintending Engineer

ORDER The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous and therefore, nothing survives for further consideration in the matter.

¶2Recording the submission of the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

06.04.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi P.T.ASHA

, J.

mbi

06.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA WP(MD)No.873/2020 & WMP(MD)No.659/2020 Sheik Ameerali ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation LTD, Meenatchinayckan Patti, Dindugal District. 2.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation LTD, Oddanchatram Town, Dindugal District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent in Lr.No.AEE/Town/ODC/F.THEFT OF ENERGY/D./2019 dated 16.12.2019 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.I.Velpradeep For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel