- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 August 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA(MD) 1111/2005
Judgment
J U D G M E N T It is seen that the first appellant died on 29.10.2010 and the sole respondent died on 12.11.2010. To that effect, a memo dated 18.01.2011 has also been filed by the counsel for the appellants. However, no steps have been taken till date. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.
30.08.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes skn To
1.The Principal District Judge, Thanjavur.
2.The District Munsif Court, Thiruvaiyaru.
3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
,J.
skn
30.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY 1.Thangaiyyan alias Arokiyasamy 2.Christhuraj alias Raja 3.Jayaraj ... Appellants Vs. T.Arunachalam ... Respondent PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree dated 27.07.2004 made in A.S.No.12 of 2004 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Thanjavur confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 03.12.2003 made in O.S.No.20 of 2003 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Thiruvaiyaru. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondent : No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.