- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 1 August 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 999/2011
Judgment
ORDER In view of the order passed in W.P.(MD)Nos.13965 & 13966 of 2014, the order impugned in the writ petition has to be necessarily sustained. The Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
01.08.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To The Assistant Commissioner, Urban Land Tax, Tirunelveli.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
01.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 M.A.S.Akbar Zindha Mohideen (died) 2.Nalla Meeral 3.Peer Fathima 4.Mohammed Abdul Latheef 5.Mahamudal Ibrahim 6.Ameena Saliha (the petitioners 2 to 6 are impleaded vide order dated 01.08.2023 in W.M.P.(MD)No.15490 of 2023) ... Petitioners Vs. The Assistant Commissioner, Urban Land Tax, Tirunelveli. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the respondent in A4/1268/99, dated 01.06.09 which is served on 06.01.0211 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondent to hand over the lands in S.No.785/1 and 766/1 situated at Suthamalli Village, Tirunelveli District which was acquired under the Tamil Nadu Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978 to the petitioner. For Petitioners : Mr.H.Arumugam For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.