Arumugam v. Manickam

J U D G M E N T When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that the sold respondent passed away in the year 2012 itself.

¶2Since no steps have been taken, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

30.08.2023 skn To

1.The I Additional Sub Judge, Tirunelveli.

2.The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri.

3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

,J.

skn and M.P(MD)No.9087 of 2005

30.08.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and M.P(MD)No.9087 of 2005 Arumugam ... Appellant Vs. Manickam ... Respondent PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree dated 17.02.2003 made in A.S.No.112 of 2002 on the file of the I Additional Sub Judge, Tirunelveli confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 20.11.2001 made in O.S.No.689 of 1996 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri. For Appellant : Mr.S.Sivathilakar For Respondent : No appearance