- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 10 August 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA(MD) 303/2005
Judgment
J U D G M E N T The learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that the sole appellant has passed away and even though he has sent a letter to the legal representatives, he has not received any instruction so far.
¶2In view of the above, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.
16.08.2023 akv To
1.The Principal District Judge, Thanjavur.
2.The Additional Sub Judge, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.
3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
,J.
akv
16.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Arumugham @ P.Ramesh ... Appellant Vs. 1.Palanimurugan 2.Manthurai Moovayarar 3.Shanthiammal 4.Dhanabal 5.Pandiyarajan 6.Muruganandham 7.Manikandan 8.Selvarani ... Respondents PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.113 of 2003 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Thanjavur dated 14.06.2004, confirming the judgment and decree in O.S.No.113 of 1996 on the file of the Additional Sub Judge, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District, dated 18.07.2003. For Appellant : Mr.T.Sekar For Respondents : Mr.R.Mathyalagan
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.