- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 20 February 2023
- Bench
- S. Sounthar
- Case no.
- SA(MD) 433/2005
Judgment
JUDGMENT When the matter was taken up for hearing on 09.02.2023, there was no representation for the appellants. In order to give an opportunity to the appellants, the Second Appeal was directed to be posted today i.e. 20.02.2023 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today there is no representation for the appellants. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed 'for default'. No costs.
20.02.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No vsd To
1.The Subordinate Judge, Tuticorin.
2.The Additional District Munsif, Tiruchendur.
3.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
S.SOUNTHAR, J. vsd
20.02.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.02.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR 1.Petchiammal 2.Ganesan 3.Minor Sundari ... Appellants/Respondents /Defendants Vs. Mayakrishnan ... Respondent/Appellant /Plaintiff PRAYER :- This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree, dated 18.10.2004 passed in A.S.No. 67 of 2003 on the file of the Sub-Judge, Tuticorin, reversing the judgment and decree, dated 27.06.2003 passed in O.S.No.32 of 1996 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Tiruchendur. For Appellants : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.