Karuppaiah v. Sri Arulmigu Thaymanasamy

JUDGMENT When the second appeal was taken up for hearing on

15.02.2023, learned counsel for the appellants reported "no instructions". Therefore, Registry was directed to delete his name and post the second appeal 'for dismissal', by printing the name of the appellants in the cause-list.

2.Today, the second appeal is posted by printing the names of the appellants. However, there is no representation for the appellants today. Hence, the second appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.

16.02.2023 NCS :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No PNM To

¶1The Sub Judge, Sub Court, Trichy

¶2The III Additional District Munsif, Trichy.

¶3The Executive Officer, Sri Arulmigu Thaymanasamy Vikraham, Malaikottai, Trichy-2.

¶4The Commissioner, Corporation of Trichy, Municipal Office, Trichy-1.

¶5The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. S. SOUNTHAR, J., PNM JUDGMENT IN

16.02.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.02.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR 1. Karuppaiah 2. Vasantha Devi 3. Sekar 4. Ravi 5. Sridhar ... Defendants 1 to 5/Respondents 1 to 5/Appellants Vs 1. Sri Arulmigu Thaymanasamy Vikraham, Trichy, Rep. by Executive Officer, Malaikottai, Trichy-2. ... Plaintiff/Appellant/1st respondent 2. The Commissioner, Corporation of Trichy, Municipal Office, Trichy-1. ... 7th Defendant/6th respondent/2nd respondent PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure against the decree and Judgment, dated 04.11.2004 in A.S. No. 67 of 2001 on the file of Sub Court, Trichy, partly reversing the Judgment and decree, dated 26.02.2001 made in O.S.No.2154 of 1993, on the file of III Additional District Munsif Court, Trichy. For Appellants : No Appearance For R1 : Mr.M.Saravanan