Selvarani v. The Managing Director

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.695 to 697, 699 of 2020, 4255, 4261 of 2021, 14904 and 14905 of 2023 W.P.(MD)No.913 of 2020: Selvarani ... Petitioner vs.

¶1The Managing Director, Tamilnadu Small Industries Development Corporation (SIDCO), SIDCO Corporate Office Building, Th.Vi.Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 32.

2.The Branch Manager, Tamilnadu Small Scale Industrial Development Corporation Limited (SIDCO), SIDCO Industrial Estate, Ariyamangalam, Trichy – 620 010. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent in Rc.No.887/A/2019, dated 16.10.2019 and proceedings in Rc.No.887/A/2019-1, dated 05.12.2019 and to quash the same and consequently, to forbear the respondents from in any manner interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the house property of the petitioner comprised in Labour Tenement No. 40, Ariyamangalam Village, Trichy East Taluk, Trichy Disrict. W.P.(MD)No.915 of 2020: M.Sekar ... Petitioner vs.

¶1The Managing Director, Tamilnadu Small Industries Development Corporation (SIDCO), SIDCO Corporate Office Building, Th.Vi.Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 32.

2.The Branch Manager, Tamilnadu Small Scale Industrial Development Corporation Limited (SIDCO), SIDCO Industrial Estate, Ariyamangalam, Trichy – 620 010. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent in Rc.No.887/A/2019, dated 14.10.2019 and proceedings in Rc.No.887/A/2019-1, dated 04.12.2019 and to quash the same and consequently, to forbear the respondents from in any manner interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the house property of the petitioner comprised in Labour Tenement No. 24, Ariyamangalam Village, Trichy East Taluk, Trichy Disrict. In both cases: For Petitioner : Mr.K.Muthumalai For R1 : Mr.K.P.Krishnadoss For R2 : Mr.Sakthikumaran ***** COMMON ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner in both the writ petitions submitted that the petitioners in both the writ petitions are not inclined to adjudicate the issue. Hence, the learned Counsel for the petitioner sought the permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petitions and the made an endorsement to that effect.

2.In view of the above said submission, the writ petitions are closed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Index : Yes / No

21.08.2023 Internet : Yes (1/3) NCC : Yes / No Tmg S.SRIMATHY, J Tmg

21.08.2023 (1/3)