VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Murugan v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 November 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 807/2023

Judgment

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition is filed to call for the records pertaining to the Final Report in Spl.SC.No.128 of 2022, on the file of the Fast Track Mahila Judge, Dindigul, u/s.5(n)(m) and 6 of the POCSO Act and U/s.Sec 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.229 of 2022 on the file of first respondent Police and quash the same as devoid of merits.

¶2The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that after full trial, in Spl.SC.No.128 of 2022, ended in acquittal on

24.04.2023 before the Mahila Court, Dindigul District.

¶3Recording the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this matter has become infructuous. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

23.11.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Indu To

1.The Inspector Police Dhadikombu Police Station, Dindigul District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN. J. Indu Crl.O.P.(MD) No.807 of 2023

23.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.807 of 2023 Murugan ... Petitioner/Sole Accused/ Sole Accused Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by the Inspector Police Dhadikombu Police Station, Dindigul District. (Crime No.229 of 2022). ...1st Respondent/Complainant/ Complainant 2.Mala ...2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant/Defacto Complinant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records pertaining to the Final Report in Spl.SC.No.128 of 2022, on the file of the Fast Track Mahila Judge, Dindigul, u/s.5(n)(m) and 6 of the POCSO Act and U/s.Sec 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.229 of 2022 on the file of first respondent Police and quash the same as devoid of merits. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Sargunam For R1 :Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R2 : Mr.P.Manoharan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.