- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 22 June 2023
- Bench
- P. Velmurugan
- Case no.
- SA(MD) 612/2005
Judgment
JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo stating that the respondents have vacated the building and hence, the appellants seek permission of this Court to withdraw this Second Appeal.
¶2The said memo is recorded. Since there is no necessity to answer the substantial questions of law, this Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
22.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No skn To:
1.The I Additional Subordinate Court, Tiruchirappalli.
2.The II Additional District Munsif Court, Tiruchirappalli.
3.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
P.VELMURUGAN, J. skn and M.P(M D)No.1 of 2009
22.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 22.06.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2009 1.Chandrasekaran 2.Ellangovan 3.Arulmozhi ... Appellants -vs- 1.N.Vadivambal 2.Saraswathi villas Patasalai rep. by its Correspondent, Saraswathi villas Patasalai Middle School, Krishnankovil Street, Beem Nagar, Tiruchirapalli – 1. ..Respondents PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Code of Civil Procedure, against the Judgment and Decree dated 07.12.2004 passed in A.S.No.123 of 2001 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Subordinate Court, Tiruchirappalli reversing the well considered Judgment and Decree dated 10.10.2001 passed in O.S.No.1866 of 1992 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif Court, Tiruchirappalli. For Appellants ... Mr.S.Ramesh For Respondents ... No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.