VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Illanchezian v. The Tahsildar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 October 2023
Bench
N. Anand Venkateshauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 1613/2021

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed for the issue of writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner on 31.11.2020 and to cancel the patta issued in favour of the second respondent with respect to 1 cent of land out of 46 cents.

¶2The case of the petitioner is that the subject property totally measuring an extent of 45 cents was conveyed in favour of the second respondent. The balance 1 cent is being used as pathway and for taking water for irrigation for the other lands belonging to the petitioner. However, the first respondent had issued patta in favour of the second respondent with respect to the entire extent of 46 cents. In view of the same, the petitioner alleges that the second respondent is preventing the petitioner from using the pathway and taking water for irrigation. Hence, the petitioner made a representation to the first respondent for cancellation of the patta with respect to 1 cent out of 46 cents. Since the same was not considered, the present Writ Petition has been filed before this Court.

¶3In the considered view of this Court, the petitioner has to necessarily file an appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer against the issuance of patta by the first respondent for the total extent of 46 cents. Hence, there shall be a direction to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukottai District, seeking for the cancellation of the patta with respect to 1 cent out of 46 cents that was issued in favour of the second respondent. On receipt of the same, the Revenue Divisional Officer shall issue notice to the petitioner and to the legal heirs of the second respondent. (It is reported that the second respondent died during the pendency of the writ petition). Upon hearing them, the Revenue Divisional Officer shall pass final orders within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of the appeal from the petitioner.

¶4This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs.

10.10.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. tsg To The Tahsildar, Arandhangi Taluk, Pudukottai District.

10.10.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH R.Illanchezian ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Arandhangi Taluk, Pudukottai District. 2.Mathiyazhahan ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 31.11.2020 on the file of the first respondent herein. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Illanchezian For R-1 : Ms.S.Jeyapriya, Government Advocate For R-2 : Mr.D.Rameshkumar

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.