VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Selva Thangam v. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Tharuvaikulam

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 January 2026
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 519/2026

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 20/01/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

¶1Selva Thangam

¶2Vasanth ... Petitioners/Accused

Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Tharuvaikulam Police Station, Thoothukudi District. (Crime No. 192 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.S.Vishnuvardhan

For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No. 192 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 22.12.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2) & 351(3) of BNS and Section 25(1A) of Arms Act, in Crime No.192 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seek bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that due to a wordy quarrel, the petitioners assaulted the defacto complainant and caused injuries. Hence, the complaint.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent person and they have not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioners are in judicial custody from 22.12.2025. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that three previous cases are pending against the petitioner and that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. However, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioners.

¶5Taking into consideration of the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners, subject to the following conditions:

¶6Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrage, Ottapidaram, and on further conditions that :- [a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. [c] the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS. (S S Y J)

20.01.2026 jbr TO

¶1The Judicial Magistrate, Ottapidaram.

¶2The Superintendent, District Jail, Peraurani.

¶3The Inspector of Police, Tharuvaikulam Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

¶4The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. S.SRIMATHY,J jbr ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.519 of 2026 Date : 20/01/2026

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.