VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Muthu Pillai (Died), Krishnammal v. Sudalai

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 June 2023
Bench
P. Velmuruganauthor
Case no.
CMP(MD) 866/2023

Judgment

CMP(MD) No.866 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Third day of June Two Thousand and Twenty Three PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.VELMURUGAN CMP(MD) No.866 of 2023 in SA (MD) No.166 of 2006 1 MUTHU PILLAI (DIED) 2 KRISHNAMMAL 3 MARISELVI 4 GANDHIRAJAN (DIED) 5 MUTHULAKSHMI ... Petitioners / Appellants Vs 1 SUDALAI 2 PETCHIRANI 3 MURUGAN 4 PETCHIAMMAL ... Respondents 1 to 4 / Respondents 1 to 4 5 M.MUTHUPANDI ... 5th Respondent / Proposed 5th Respondent Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to implead the 5th respondent herein as 5th respondent in the above second appeal in SA(MD).No. 166 of 2006. Prayer in SA(MD) No.166 of 2006: To prefer this memorandum of second appeal against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.51 of 2005 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Kovilpatti dated 03.11.2005 reversing the judgment and Decree passed in O.S.No.55 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kovilpatti on 01.04.2005. ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.M.P.SENTHIL, Advocate for the CMP(MD) No.866 of 2023 petitioners, the court made the following order:- This petition is filed to implead the 5th respondent herein as 5th respondent in the above second appeal in SA(MD)No.166 of 2006.

2.It is stated that the the fifth respondent purchased the suit property pending second appeal.

¶3Pending of the second appeal would bind the subsequent purchaser and hence, his presence is absolutely not necessary in the second appeal for deciding the substantial questions of law. Therefore, this Court is of the opinion that the subsequent purchaser need not be added as party. Hence, this petition is dismissed. sd/- 23/06/2023 / TRUE COPY / /07/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. SKN To

1.The Subordinate Judge, Kovilpatti.

2.The District Munsif, Kovilpatti. +1CC to M/s.M.P.SENTHIL, Advocate, SR-30988(F), dated 27.06.2023. ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.866 of 2023 in SA (MD) No.166 of 2006 Date :23/06/2023 ED/VR/SAR- (05/07/2023) 2P 4C

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.