VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

K. Jayaraman (Died) v. The Managing Director,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 June 2023
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 7972/2012

Judgment

O R D E R The petitioner has served as Standing Counsel for TNSTC.

2.The contention of the petitioner is that the respondent has not paid legal fees which he is entitled to for the service rendered to the respondent.

¶3The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner has claimed fees for 9 cases. However, the fees for 4 cases were paid as per the rates stated in the G.O., which was prevailing during that time. The balance alone was not paid. Pending writ petition, the petitioner died.

¶4Therefore, this Court is of the considered opinion that the respondent has paid for 4 cases and the prayer in the writ petition is partly granted by the respondent.

¶5The respondent Corporation submitted that they do not have evidence for the other four cases. Moreover, they do not have the copy of the bill which the petitioner is claiming. If the legal heirs are able to produce any evidence to that effect, the same may be submitted and a claim shall be made against the respondent. If they have the copy of the bill, the legal heirs are at liberty to submit the same.

¶6With the above said liberty, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Index : Yes / No

06.06.2023 Internet : Yes (2/5) NCC : Yes / No Tmg S.SRIMATHY, J Tmg

06.06.2023 (2/5)

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY K.Jayaraman (Died) 1.J.Vijayalakshmi 2.J.Madhanmohan 3.J.Eswari 4.J.Mahalakshmi 5.J.Manjula Devi ... Petitioners vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, Kumbakonam Limited, Karaikudi Region, Kovilur Road, Karaikudi. ... Respondent (P1 to P5 are substituted for the deceased sole petitioner, vide Court order, dated 06.03.2017, in W.M.P.(MD)No.2729 of 2017) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to settle the professional/legal charges of Rs.25,000/- with 24% interest per annum to the petitioner from 23.01.2012 till the date of payment to the petitioners. For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.D.Sivaraman *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.