VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

The Divisional Manager, v. Muthulakshmi

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 January 2023
Bench
S Justice R. Tharaniauthor
Case no.
CMP(MD) 849/2023

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S Justice R. Tharani

Judgment

CMP(MD)No.849 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of January Two Thousand and Twenty Three PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI CMP(MD)No.849 of 2023 in CMA(MD)No.69 of 2023 THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, ELLIS NAGAR, 70 FEET ROAD, 12 PARVATHY PALAZA, GROUND FLOOR, MADURAI. ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT

Vs 1 MUTHULAKSHMI 2 DURAIRAJ 3 VASANTHI 4 PRIYA

5 N.J. ARUNKUMAR 6 KANNAYIRAM 7 P. RAJA ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to direct Workmen Compensation Commissioner, madurai to receive the deposit of the awarded amount with cost an interst after deducting TDS in accordance with the secion 194A of Income Tax Act in respect of the award passed in E.C. No. 116 of 2016 before the Honourable Commissioner of Labour, Madurai (Workmen Compensation) pending disposal of the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and thus rendrer justice. Prayer in CMA(MD). 69/ 2023 : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under section 30 of Employees Compensation Act to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 17/10/2022 passed in E.C. No. 101 of 2017 before the Honourable Commissioner of Labour, Madurai (Workmen Compensation). CMP(MD)No.849 of 2023 ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.G.PRABHU RAJADURAI, Advocate for the petitioner, while admitting the CMA., the court made the following order:- On the side of the petitioner/appellant, it is stated that the petitioner / appellant is ready to deposit the entire amount, less 10% towards TDS. But, the Deputy Commissioner of Labour refused to receive the D.D and insisted the appellant to deposit the amount, without deduction of the TDS.

¶2The Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Madurai (Workmen Compensation), is hereby directed to receive the award amount, less 10% towards TDS. This Petition is allowed accordingly. sd/- 30/01/2023

/ TRUE COPY / /02/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. LS TO The Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Madurai (Workmen Compensation). +1 CC to M/s.G.PRABHU RAJADURAI, Advocate ( SR-1499[I] dated 31/01/2023 ) ORDER IN CMP(MD)No.849 of 2023

in

CMA(MD)No.69 of 2023 Date :30/01/2023 RK/SAR-4(06/02/2023) 2P/3C

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.