VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M.Antony Mennoharine Michael v. The Government of Tamilnadu Rep. by Its Secretary

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 January 2026
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 1097/2026

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner joined the service of the respondent Transport Corporation on 30.04.1993 and after rendering 29 years of service, he retired from service on 31.05.2022. A tripartite wage settlement under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act was entered into between the Management and Trade Unions on 24.08.2022. As per the terms of settlement, the Management has agreed to revise the wages of the employees who were in service as on 01.09.2019 by revising the pay with effect from 01.09.2019 notionally and monetary benefits with effect from 01.01.2022.

¶2The petitioner was in service as on 01.09.2019 and therefore, the petitioner made a representation dated 16.12.2025 to the respondent seeking the benefits due to him as per the wage settlement. Alleging inaction, he has filed this writ petition seeking a mandamus to the respondents to revise his wages, based on the wage settlement dated

24.08.2022 and to pay the benefits with interest.

¶3The learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation submits that they would consider the request of the petitioner and pass orders on merits.

¶4Considering the prayer sought for this in this writ petition, the respondents are directed to pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 16.12.2025 on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

21.01.2026 ogy Index : Yes / No. Internet: Yes / No. NCC : Yes / No. To

¶1The Secretary, Transport Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

¶2The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd., Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

¶3The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd., KTC Nagar, Tirunelveli Region, Tirunelveli.

¶4The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

21.01.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.01.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI M.Antony Mennoharine Michael ...Petitioner Vs 1. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Transport Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd., Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. 3. The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd., KTC Nagar, Tirunelveli Region, Tirunelveli. 4. The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002. ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus directing to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to implement the 14th wage settlement (ghh;it C1/23053 of 2019) signed under Section 12(3) of the I.D.Act dated 24.08.2022 and to re-calculate the retirement benefits of the petitioner such as difference amount of gratuity, leave salary, provident fund, commuted value of pension, revised pension for the period from 01.09.2019 to 31.05.2022 (date of retirement) pension arrears and other retirement benefits and consequently direct the respondents to pay the petitioner the difference amount of the same along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum within the time limit stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj For R1 : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar, Special Government Pleader For R2 and R3 : Mr.Ferlin Castro, Standing Counsel For R4 : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh, Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.