- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 1 September 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 39/2023
Judgment
ORDER This contempt petition has been filed that the orders of this Court dated
21.04.2022 passed in WP(MD)No.7592 of 2022 has not been complied with.
2.Today, the learned Additional Government Pleader based on the proceedings of the Tahsildar, Periyakulam dated 28.02.2023 in Na.Ka.No.9117/2022/S1 submits that pursuant to the orders of this Court dated
21.04.2022, the respondents have conducted survey for the land in Survey No. 1417/1 and found that the entire 94 cents of the land vest with the school, the same is fenced and it is in the possession of the school. A copy of the above proceedings has also been communicated to the petitioner.
¶3In view of the above, this contempt petition stands closed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings of the Tahsildar in the manner known to law.
01.09.2023 dsk To The Tahsildar, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District. B.PUGALENDHI
,J.
dsk in W.P(MD)No.7592 of 2022
01.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI in W.P(MD)No.7592 of 2022 T.Saravanan ... Petitioner/Petitioner vs. A.Kader Sherif, The Tahsildar, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District. ... Contemnor/Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnors for the willfully and deliberately violating the order of this Court made in WP(MD)No.7592 of 2022 dated 21.04.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Thirumarai For Respondent : Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.