VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M. Poomayil v. The Director General of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 June 2026
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 2001/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow B.Pugalendhi

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, with a grievance that the respondent Police – CBCID has not conducted the investigation in a proper manner and has suppressed certain material facts and also not arrayed the main accused in this case, has filed this writ petition seeking transfer of investigation from CBCID to CBI.

¶2When this petition was taken up for hearing on 17.03.2026, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, based on the instructions provided to him, submitted that the final report has already been filed before the concerned Judicial Magistrate on 21.03.2025 through e-filing in LTN 20250000678C202500001, however, it has not been taken on file. The investigating officer has given a letter to the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Madurai, on 22.01.2026, requesting to take steps to number the case. Thereafter, the learned Judicial Magistrate has taken the final report on file in Crl.M.P.No.105 of 2026 dated 20.02.2026 and issued notice to the complainant for raising objections, if any, for the final report filed by the investigating officer.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought time to ascertain the same and to advise the petitioner to appear before the concerned Judicial Magistrate and raise her objections to the final report.

¶4Considering the request made by the petitioner, the matter stand adjourned.

¶5Today, when this writ petition is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate and also filed a protest petition. Therefore, he is not pressing this petition.

¶6In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to workout her remedy before the concerned Judicial Magistrate. No costs.

22.06.2026 ogy Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. NCC : Yes / No. To

¶1The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Chennai.

¶2The Joint Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, Chennai Zone, III Floor, EVK Sampath Building, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

¶3The Additional Director General of Police (CB-CID), Office of the Additional Director General of Police, Beach Road, Chennai.

¶4The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Central Bureau of Investigation, No.73, Athikulam Main Road, Reserve Line Post, Madurai - 625014.

¶5The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police,

¶6The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Oomachikulam,

¶7The Inspector of Police, Oomachikulam Police Station,

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

¶8The Inspector of Police, CBCID,

22.06.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 22.06.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI M. Poomayil ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Chennai. 2. The Joint Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, Chennai Zone, III Floor, EVK Sampath Building, College Road, Chennai – 600 006. 3. The Additional Director General of Police (CB-CID), Office of the Additional Director General of Police, Beach Road, Chennai. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Central Bureau of Investigation, No.73, Athikulam Main Road, Reserve Line Post, Madurai - 625014. 5. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, 6. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Oomachikulam, 7. The Inspector of Police, Oomachikulam Police Station, 8. The Inspector of Police, CBCID, ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent No.1 and 3 to withdraw the case in Crime No.02 of 2014 on the file of the respondent No.8 and entrust the same to the respondent No.4 for complete the investigation in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Dr.R.Alagumani For R1, R3, R5 to R8 : Mr.A.Robinson, Counsel for State of Tamil Nadu (Crl. side) For R2 and R4 : Mr.M.Mohideen Basha, Special Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.