V.Poongavanam, v. The Commissioner,

ORDER Mr.Vashik Ali, learned counsel representing Mr.D.Nallathambi, learned counsel for the petitioner, represents that pending the Writ Petition, the petitioner has retired from service and therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in the present Writ Petition.

¶2Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

16.10.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Lm To

1.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Aringar Anna Maligai, Madurai.

2.The Chief Educational Officer for Corporation, Madurai Corporation Schools, Aringar Anna Maligai, Madurai – 2. V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J. Lm

16.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.10.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN V.Poongavanam .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Aringar Anna Maligai, Madurai. 2.The Chief Educational Officer for Corporation, Madurai Corporation Schools, Aringar Anna Maligai, Madurai – 2. 3.R.Mallika .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 herein to consider the petitioner's objections dated 09.04.2013 for the seniority list of P.G.Assistant working in Madurai Corporation Higher Secondary Schools for the year 2013-2014 within a time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.Vashik Ali for Mr.D.Nallathambi For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.K.K.Kannan