VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Pankajam v. The District Registrar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 March 2023
Bench
C.V. Karthikeyanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 992/2023

Judgment

O R D E R Let the petitioner apply afresh online for registration of relinquishment / sale deed through the respondents and if necessary token be obtained. I am confident that the respondents would register the document.

¶2Let the petitioner apply and a direction is given to the second respondent, Sub Registrar, Sreerangham Sub Register Office to take a decision about the registration of the deed presented, if it is otherwise adequately stamped and necessary registration fee had been paid and the covenants of the document are also acceptable and lawful in the assessment of the second respondent. No further directions are required.

¶3The petitioner may represent the documents within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and if it is done so within a period of ten working days thereafter, a decision can be taken by the second respondent to register the document or if he seeks any clarification, to put them in writing and clarify from the petitioner.

¶4This Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

24.03.2023 NCC: Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No vji To

¶1The District Registrar, Office of the District Registrar,

¶2The Sub Registrar, Sreerangham Sub Register Office, Sreerangham,

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. vji W.P.(MD)No.992 of 2023

24.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P.(MD)No.992 of 2023 Pankajam ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Registrar, Office of the District Registrar, 2. The Sub Registrar, Sreerangham Sub Register Office, Sreerangham, ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to register a settlement deed of the petitioner in favour of his son namely K.Vaigunthan on the file of the second respondent Office, vide Temporary Acknowledgment No.TP/141067608/2023, dated 09.01.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Senthilkumar For Respondents : Mr.M.Prakash

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.