- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 22 January 2026
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 1596/2026
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned assessment order dated 01.10.2024 passed by the 1st respondent.
¶2When this matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is willing to file an appeal against the said impugned assessment order. Therefore, though he had sought for larger relief in this petition, he had restricted his relief to the extent to request this Court to grant liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal.
¶3Further, he would submit that now, the petitioner is willing to pay 10% of the disputed tax amount towards additional pre-deposit to the respondent while filing the appeal. Hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.
¶4In reply, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent requests this Court to pass any appropriate orders with regard to the filing of appeal on terms.
¶5Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent and also perused the materials available on record.
¶6In the case on hand, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that now the petitioner is willing to file an appeal against the impugned assessment order dated 01.10.2024 passed by the 1st respondent and he has restricted his relief and requested this Court to grant liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned assessment order since it will be sufficient to meet out the case of the petitioner.
¶7Further, it was submitted that the petitioner is willing to pay 10% of the disputed tax amount to the respondent. Therefore, though this petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 01.10.2024, considering the submissions made by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to dismiss the present petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned assessment order.
¶8Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.
¶9While dismissing this petition, this Court grants liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the concerned Appellate Authority, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, subject to the payment of 10% of the disputed tax amount, over and above the statutory pre-deposit, to the respondent as agreed by the petitioner. Upon payment of said amount, the Appellate Authority shall consider the said appeal filed by the petitioner, if it is otherwise in order, on its own merits and in accordance with law, by providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner, without pressing for limitation.
22.01.2026 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No nsa To
¶1The Assistant Commissioner O/o, The Assistant Commissioner of GST and Central Excise Trichy I Division No. 1, Williams Road Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli - 620 001.
¶2The Assistant Commissioner of GST and Central Excise Tambaram Division No.40, Ranga Colony Rajakilpakkam, Chennai 600 073. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY.J., nsa & W.M.P(MD)Nos.1266 & 1267 of 2026
22.01.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY & W.M.P(MD)Nos.1266 & 1267 of 2026 M/s. First Source Solutions Limited Represented by its Authorized Signatory Mr. Cyrus Rusi Shroff Plot No. 41/2 and 41/3, 2nd Floor Raja Trade Center, Bharathiya Salai Cantonment Tiruchirappalli - 620 001. ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Assistant Commissioner O/o, The Assistant Commissioner of GST and Central Excise Trichy I Division No. 1, Williams Road Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli - 620 001. 2. The Assistant Commissioner of GST and Central Excise Tambaram Division No.40, Ranga Colony Rajakilpakkam, Chennai 600 073. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, call for the records pertaining to the impugned order vide DRC 07 dated 01.10.2024 in Ref. No. ZD3310240035228 passed by the 1st respondent for the year 2017 - 2018 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.Derrick Sam For Respondent : Mr.R.Gowri Shankar
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.