- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 11 September 2023
- Bench
- S Justice S.Srimathy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 1665/2021
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition is filed for Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the impugned order, dated 07.01.2021 and also seeking a consequential direction to the respondents to grant extension of time for a period of 24 months, for completion of the construction.
¶2Heard Mr.R.Murali, for M/s.K.Govindarajan, the Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.M.Gangatharan, the Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents and perused the material documents available on record.
¶3The petitioner was allotted Plot No.16 through a registered Lease Deed, dated 25.04.1995 for a period of 99 years of lease. The condition for such allotment is that the petitioner should put up construction within a stipulated time, but the petitioner could not put up the said construction within the prescribed time and there was a delay.
¶4The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that he started construction of the buildings in a phased manner with proper architectural design for utilizing the entire extent of 4.98 acres and in the year 2015, First Phase of the proposed construction was completed. However, the 1st respondent has issued notice on 23.07.2015, stating that the entire area was not utilized for putting up construction. Hence, from 4.98 acres allotted land the respondents have cancelled 2.50 acres of land and directed the petitioner to surrender. The same was challenged by the petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.14548 of 2015, this Court, vide order, dated 03.08.2018 directed the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.30 lakhs. On such payment the respondents are directed to re-allot the 2.50 acres to the petitioner. The petitioner has already paid the said amount, in November 2018. The respondents have re-allotted 2.50 acres. When the petitioner was ready to put up construction, there was Lock down due to Covid-2019. Hence, the petitioner could not put-up construction within a stipulated time. Thereafter, the respondents have passed the impugned order. Against the same, the writ petition is filed.
¶5The contention of the petitioner is that he has already started to putting up construction, because of the impugned proceedings, the respondents disturbing the construction.
¶6Having paid the amount of Rs.30 lakhs for reallotment, the petitioner is entitled to be considered. Moreover, due to Covid-19 lock down the petitioner could not construct as per estimated time. Therefore, by taking the facts narrated supra into consideration, this Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioner is entitled for further time. Therefore, the impugned order, 07.01.2021 is hereby quashed. The petitioner is directed to put up building construction and the same shall be completed, within 30th day of September 2024. The petitioner is not entitled for further extension of time.
¶7With the above directions, this Writ Petition is allowed in above terms. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
11.09.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes
NCC : Yes / No ksa To
¶1The Managing Director, State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited. No.19-A Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008
¶2The Project Officer, SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Tuticorin. S.SRIMATHY, J ksa W.P.(MD)No. 1665 of 2021
11.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.(MD)No. 1665 of 2021 and W.M.P(MD)Nos. 1409 & 13446 of 2021 Ganeshraja Organizations Private Limited, Represented by the Managing Director, Mr.A.Ganeshrajah ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Managing Director, State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited. No.19-A Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008 2. The Project Officer, SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Tuticorin. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 1st Respondent contained in its order bearing reference No.P-III/SIC-TUT/Ganesh Raja/2020 dated 07.01.2021 and to quash the same as arbitrary unjust and illegal and to consequently direct the Respondents to grant an Extension of 24 months for completion of the construction and commencement of commercial production. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murali, for M/s.K.Govindarajan For Respondents : Mr.M.Gangatharan
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.