VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Arulmighu Pallathalamman Kovil v. The District Collector,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 January 2026
Bench
K. Surenderauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 2237/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow K. Surender

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to pay the compensation amount arising out of the acquisition of the lands comprised in Old Survey No.125/2, bearing New Survey Nos.162/2A, 162/2B, 162/2C, 162/2D and 162/2E, classified as punja land, measuring an extent of 5 acres out of the total extent of 6 acres, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 26.09.2025.

¶2With the consent of the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶3The grievance of the petitioner is that the subject properties belonged to the temple. The same were acquired by the Government for the formation of a road to ease traffic congestion and to facilitate access to the Samayapuram Mariamman Temple. However, the compensation Page No. 2 of 5 amount has not been disbursed to the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 26.09.2025. However, no action has been taken on the petitioner's representation. Hence, the petitioner has been constrained to file the present Writ Petition.

¶4The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, on instructions, would submit that the petitioner's representation dated 26.09.2025 would be considered and appropriate orders would be passed by the first respondent within a period of sixteen weeks.

¶5Recording the above submission and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.09.2025 and pass appropriate orders on its merits and in accordance with law within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the petitioner is entitled to the compensation, the same shall be disbursed in accordance with law. The first respondent is also directed to provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and any other interested parties who may be Page No. 3 of 5 affected by such decision, before passing any order. There shall be no order as to costs. [K.SURENDER, J.]

30.01.2026 JEN Index : Yes / No To

1.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District.

2.The District Revenue Officer (L & A), Tiruchirappalli District.

3.The District Revenue Officer, Tiruchirappalli District. Page No. 4 of 5 K.SURENDER

, J.

JEN

30.01.2026 Page No. 5 of 5

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER Arulmighu Pallathalamman Kovil Rep. by its Hereditary Trustee, Narasingamangalam, Samayapuram, Manachanallur, Tiruchirappalli District. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District. 2.The District Revenue Officer (L & A), Tiruchirappalli District. 3.The District Revenue Officer, Tiruchirappalli District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to pay the compensation amount arising out of the acquisition of the lands comprised in Old S.No.125/2 bearing New S.Nos.162/2A, 162/2B, 162/2C, 162/2D and 162/2E classified as punja land which has an extent of 5 Acres out of the total extent of 6 acres by considering the representation dated 26.09.2025. Page No. 1 of 5 For Petitioner : Mr.V.Chandrasekar For Respondents : Mr.B.Ramanathan Additional Government Pleader *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.