- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 October 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 1355/2022
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that the matter has become infructuous and nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition.
2.Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
05.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
05.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.1204 of 2022 N.Manickam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent Engineer, TANGEDCO, Sivnathipatti Road, Thiagaraja Nagar, Tirunelveli. 2.The Assistant Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO Distribution, Puliangudi, Tenkasi District. 3.The Assistant Engineer, TANGEDCO, Puliangudi, Tenkasi District. 4.J.A.Selvaraj ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing these respondents 2 and 3 to remove and change the route of the existing high tension wire, going above, across the hose site plots 63 and 64, in S.No.87/1, in Cinthamani Village in Kadayanallur Taluk in Tenkasi District, within a time frame, fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.F.X.Eugene For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, Standing Counsel for R1 & R2.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.