Magamayi v. The Superintendent of Police,

ORDER The present Writ Petition Criminal has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to provide adequate police protection for effecting electricity service connection to the petitioner's property.

¶2The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner's mother and the fourth respondent's grandmother had purchased the subject property. At present, a dispute has arisen between the parties. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the fourth respondent has already filed a suit for recovery of possession. The very prayer in the said suit indicates that the petitioner is presently in possession of the property. Electricity service connection can be granted to a person who is in possession of the property. Supply of electricity is an essential service. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to seek electricity connection. However, such grant of electricity connection shall be subject to the outcome of the pending civil suit, and the petitioner shall enjoy the same until the rights of the parties are finally adjudicated therein.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the fourth respondent submitted that the petitioner ought to submit a fresh application. The petitioner, however, submitted that an application has already been submitted along with an indemnity bond to the third respondent.

¶4In view of the above, the third respondent is directed to process the petitioner's application and provide electricity service connection, if the petitioner otherwise satisfies the statutory requirements. If any law and order issue arises, the respondent police shall provide necessary police protection, subject to payment of necessary charges. It is also made clear that the fourth respondent is stated to be in partial possession of the property, and the grant of electricity connection shall not confer any additional right or equity upon the petitioner. The rights of the parties shall be independently adjudicated by the parties.

¶5With the above clarifications and directions, this Writ Petition Criminal stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

18.02.2026

(SSYJ) pal

To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent of Police Office, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Sayalkudi Police Station, Ramanthapuram District.

3.The Assistant Engineer, Sayalkudi, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Ramanathapuram District. S.SRIMATHY,J. pal ORDER IN WP.CRL.(MD) No.654 of 2026 Date: 18.02.2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 18.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.CRL.(MD). No.654 of 2026 Magamayi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent of Police Office, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Sayalkudi Police Station, Ramanthapuram District. 3.The Assistant Engineer, Sayalkudi, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Ramanathapuram District. 4.Manicknathan ... Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to give adequate police protection to provide EB connection (domestic purpose) to petitioner's premises situated at Periyakulam Village and Panchayath, Kadaladi Taluka, Ramanathapuram District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 21.11.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Mahendrarajan For R1 & R2 : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) For R4 : Mr.T.T.Nishanth