- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 15 February 2023
- Bench
- P.D.Audikesavalu
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 1781/2021
Judgment
ORDER Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he has made an endorsement to that effect in the court record.
¶2In fine, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.
15.02.2023 Index : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No Sm TO: The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Veeramakaliamman Temple, Aranthangi, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.
P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J. Sm
15.02.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.02.2023 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU and W.M.P. (MD) No. 1512 of 2021 M.Sulthan ... Petitioner Vs. The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Veeramakaliamman Temple, Aranthangi, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records of the impugned orders passed by the respondent dated 28.12.2019 and 03.11.2020 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondent to receive the rental arrears from the petitioner in 4 equal installments to the vacant site leased out to the petitioner by considering the petitioner's representations dated 22.02.2020 and 19.10.2020. For Petitioner : Mr. C.Guhaseelarupan For Respondent : Mr. G.Madhavan
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.