- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 March 2023
- Bench
- C.V. Karthikeyan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 1316/2022
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the relief sought has been complied with. No further adjudication is required. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed as the issue has become infructuous. No costs.
30.03.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No pnn To The Sub Registrar, Melaneelithanallur, Tenkasi District.
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. pnn
30.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN N.Subbaraj ... Petitioner Vs. The Sub Registrar, Melaneelithanallur, Tenkasi District. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the impugned refusal Number: RFL / Melaneelithanallur/22/2021 dated 02.12.2021 issued by the respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondent to register the document submitted by the petitioner without insisting the original parent document bearing Document No. 1318/1960 dated 20.09.1960. For Petitioner : Mr.R.J.Karthick For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.