S. Arumugam v. Kavitharam,

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The materials produced before this Court are not sufficient to come to the conclusion that the petitioner was prevented from participating in the temple festival.

3.The learned counsel for the impleaded respondent undertakes before this Court that it is always open to the petitioner to participate in any religious activity and that he will not be prevented. The said undertaking is recorded.

¶4Accordingly, this contempt petition is closed.

12.04.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No sbn To

1.Thiru.Kavitharam, District Collector, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District.

2.Mrs.Praveena Marry, The Tahsildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

3.Mr.Gunasekaran The Inspector of Police, Namasasamuthiram Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. sbn in W.P(MD)No.18234 of 2022

12.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN in W.P(MD)No.18234 of 2022 S.Arumugam ... Petitioner/ Petitioner Vs. 1.Thiru.Kavitharam, District Collector, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. 2.Mrs.Praveena Marry, The Tahsildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 3.Mr.Gunasekaran The Inspector of Police, Namasasamuthiram Police Station, Pudukkottai District. 4.Senthil ... Contemnors/ Respondents (R4 Suo Muto impleaded vide Court orde rdated 15.03.2023 in Cont.P. (MD).No.197 of 2023 by GRSJ) PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, pleased to punish the respondents for their willful and deliberate disobedience upon the order of this Court made in W.P.(MD).No.18234 of 2022 dated 12.08.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Paranjothi For Respondents : Mr.K.R.Badurus Zaman Standing Counsel