VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Sangeetha v. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Thirupullani

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 January 2026
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 1067/2026

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 22/01/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Sangeetha ... Petitioner/Accused

Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Thirupullani Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. Crime No.1/2026. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr. S.Sundarapandian,

Advocate For Respondent : Mr.S.S. Manoj Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime no.1 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 118(1), 115(2) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 (294(b), 324, 323, 506(ii) IPC and Section 4 TNPHW Act) in Crime No. 1 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel the petitioner herein is said to have attacked the defacto complainant with hands and also threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.

¶3The leaned Government Advocate (Crl. side) submits that the petitioner is wife of A1 and no one has sustained injury in the said occurrence.

¶4Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police.

¶5Considering the specific overt act attributed against the petitioner and also considering the fact that the petitioner is a woman, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram District within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready and on further conditions that: [a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall appear before the respondent Police as and when required for interrogation. [c]the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS. (S S Y J)

22.01.2026 TRP TO

¶1Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram District.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Thirupullani Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. S.SRIMATHY,J TRP ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.1067 of 2026 Date : 22/01/2026

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.