VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Mageswaran v. The District Collector

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 April 2023
Bench
P.T. Ashaauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 1964/2020

Judgment

ORDER When the matter was taken up for hearing on 24.03.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted today (20.04.2023) under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

20.04.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes cp To

1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Tahsildar, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

4.The Special Tahsildar, The Welfare of Scheduled Caste of Tribes, Virudhunagar.

5.The Taluk Head Surveyor, Taluk Office, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

P.T.ASHA, J. cp Dated: 20.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA Mageswaran ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Tahsildar, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 4.The Special Tahsildar, The Welfare of Scheduled Caste of Tribes, Virudhunagar. 5.The Taluk Head Surveyor, Taluk Office, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents Prayer :- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the fourth respondent Special Tahsildar for SC/ST Welfare, Virudhunagar dated 10.01.2020 in e.K.m1/0144/2016 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the third respondent to issue patta of the petitioner's house site in peria Perali Village, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District in Survey Nos.454/1,2,3, 455/1,3,4 in 2.36 acres of Punja land based on the enquiry report submitted by the fourth respndent dated 03.08.2016 in e.f.m1/0144/2016. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.J.John Rajadurai Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.