VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Anthony Muthu v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 January 2026
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 2841/2024

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition is filed to call for the records pertaining to the case in PRC.No.55 of 2023 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.I,Virudhunagar and quash the same as illegal.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that final report has been laid before the Court as against the accused Nos.1, 2 and 3 who are the petitioners herein for the offenses under Section 328, 269 of IPC and Section 7, 24(1) of Cigarette and other Tobacco Products Acts, 2003.

¶3It is the contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that there is no case made out from the materials collected by the prosecution as against the petitioner. Hence seeks to quash the fnial report.

¶4However, the learned Government advocate on instructions submitted that already PW.1 to PW.3 were examined and the substantial evidence had already come on record.

¶5The very submission of the learned Government Advocate would indicate that P.W.1 to P.W.3 have been examined. As the substantive evidence had already come on record and documents have also been filed by the witnesses, at this stage, this Court cannot conduct a mini trial. This Court, exercising its jurisdiction under Section 528 BNSS, cannot conduct a roving enquiry or mini trial as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gunmala Sales Private Limited v. Anu Mehta and others reported in (2015) 1 SCC 103. Since already P.W.1 and other two witnesses have deposed their evidence, it is for the trial Court to take note of it and proceed as per law. Hence this Court is not inclined to quash the proceedings. However, the trial Court is directed to complete the trial as expeditiously as possible in PRC.No.55 of 2023 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.I,Virudhunagar, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions stand closed.

28.01.2026 NCC : yes / no Index : yes / no Internet : yes / no pnn To

¶1Judicial Magistrate No.I,Virudhunagar.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar West Police Station, Virudhungar District. Crime No.584 of 2020.

¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooL.oVICTORIAoGOWRI,oJ pnn ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooORDER oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooIN oooooooooooooooooooooooooCRLoOP(MD).oNo.2841oofo2024 and CRLoMP(MD).oNos.2218oando2220oofo2024 ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooDateoo:o28/01/2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 28/01/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI and CRL MP(MD). Nos.2218 and 2220 of 2024 1. Anthony Muthu 2. Joseph Raj 3. Stephen Raj ... Petitioners Vs 1. The Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar West Police Station, Virudhungar District. Crime No.584 of 2020. 2. Parthiban Sub Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar West Police Station, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents PRAYER :- To call for the records pertaining to the case in PRC.No.55 of 2023 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.I,Virudhunagar and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.S. Maya Perumal, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh for R2 Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.