- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 29 March 2023
- Bench
- P.T. Asha
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 1786/2023
Judgment
ORDER The above writ petition has been filed for issue of a Mandamus to direct the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated
29.11.2022 and to direct the first respondent to refund the excess collection of property tax collected for the period of 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 from the petitioner.
2.From a perusal of the affidavit filed by the petitioner, it appears that an appeal petition dated 29.11.2022 has been preferred by the petitioner to the second respondent, namely the District Collector cum Inspector of Panchayat, Office of the District Collectorate, Dindigul District. However, there was no response from him.
3.Considering the fact that an appeal has been filed, direction is issued to the second respondent to dispose of the appeal of the petitioner dated 29.11.2022 within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after issuing notice to all the parties concerned and after giving them a personal hearing to make their submissions.
4.With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Speaking : Yes / No
29.03.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No mm To
1.The Executive Officer, Town Panchayat, Vadamadurai, Dindigul District.
2.The District Collector cum Inspector of Panchayat, Office of the District Collectorate, Dindigul District.
P.T.ASHA, J. mm
29.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA Alagarsamy ... Petitioner /vs./ 1.The Executive Officer, Town Panchayat, Vadamadurai, Dindigul District. 2.The District Collector cum Inspector of Panchayat, Office of the District Collectorate, Dindigul District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to consider the representation dated 29.11.2022 and also to direct the 1st respondent to refund the excess collection of property tax collected for the period of 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 from the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.N.S.Ponnaiah For Respondents : Mr.M.Senthil Ayyanar Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.