Haji M. Saleem Baig v. M.Abdul Rahman

O R D E R This Court directed the respondent to consider and pass orders. The respondent has passed an order, dated 18.07.2023 and the claim of the petitioner was rejected.

2.Therefore, contempt is not made out. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the order passed by the respondent. Hence, the contempt petition is closed. No costs. Index : Yes / No

08.08.2023 Internet : Yes Tmg S.SRIMATHY, J

Tmg

08.08.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Haji M.Saleem Baig, S/o. Janab M.Mohammed Baig, Hereditary HUGDARS and Beneficiary, Dindigul Begambur Durgah Pallivasal, No.6/10, Pallivasal Street, Begambur, Dindigul. ... Petitioner vs. M.Abdul Rahman, Chairman, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffer Sarangi Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai-1. ... Contemnor/Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for wilfully disobeying and not complying with the order of this Court, dated 01.04.2022, in W.P.(MD)No.20015 of 2018. For Petitioners : Mr.V.R.Venkatesan For Contemnor : Mr.S.A.Ajmal Khan *****