VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Palsamy v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
29 January 2026
Bench
K. Surenderauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 2143/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow K. Surender

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to make a reference to the competent Court against Award No. 21/2024 in Na.Ka.No.A2/28/2022 dated 10.06.2024, by considering the petitioner's application dated 25.08.2025, in accordance with Section 8 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 and the Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Laws (Revival of Operation, Amendment and Validation) Act, 2019, within the time to be fixed by this Court.

¶2By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's land was acquired and Award No.21/2024 dated 10.06.2024 was passed by the second respondent. The petitioner, being aggrieved by the compensation awarded, submitted an application dated 25.08.2025 seeking reference to the competent Civil Court under Section 8 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 read with the Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Laws (Revival of Operation, Amendment and Validation) Act, 2019. However, the second respondent has failed to make the reference within the statutory time. Hence, this Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the second respondent to make such reference within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶4The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner's representation will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶5Recording the above submission, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 25.08.2025, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to all the necessary parties, within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. NCC : Yes / No (K.SURENDER, J.) Index : Yes / No

29.01.2026 To:-

1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2.The Special District Revenue Officer (Land Acquisition), SIPCOT, Tirunelveli.

3.The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition in Charge), Unit-4, Solar Power Plant by SIPCOT, Tirunelveli. K.SURENDER

, J.

smn2

29.01.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.01.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER Palsamy ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2.The Special District Revenue Officer (Land Acquisition), SIPCOT, Tirunelveli. 3.The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition in Charge), Unit-4, Solar Power Plant by SIPCOT, Tirunelveli. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to make a reference to the Court against the Award No.21/2024 in Na.Ka.No.A2/28/2022 dated 10.06,2024 by considering the petitioner's application dated 25.08.2025 as per Section 8 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 and the Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Laws (Revival of Operation, Amendment and Validation) Act, 2019 within the time fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.H.Arumugam For Respondents : Mr.D.Sadiq Raja Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.