VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Annasamy .T v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
1 February 2023
Bench
D. Krishnakumarauthor, R.Vijayakumar
Case no.
WP(MD) 1889/2023

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by D. KRISHNAKUMAR, J.) The prayer in this Writ Petition is seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 herein to take necessary action for removal of the encroachments made by the fifth respondent in the public way comprised in Survey No.537/29 situated at Eppodumvenran Village, Ottapidaram Taluk, Tuticorin District by considering the petitioner's representation, dated 19.09.2022.

¶2According to the petitioner, he constructed a house in Survey No.537/29 and he is in possession and enjoyment of the same. The petitioner went out of station due to his job. In the said circumstances, the fifth respondent encroached the public way and developed a petty shop. The petitioner requested the fifth respondent to remove the petty shop from the public way. Since the fifth respondent has not removed the same, the petitioner made a representation, dated 19.09.2022 to the respondents 1 to

¶4Since the same has not been considered so far, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition.

¶3The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4, on instructions, submitted that the official respondents have identified the encroachers and found that there are encroachments in Survey No.536/30 and appropriate action will be taken for removal of the encroachments in accordance with law. The learned Additional Government Pleader further submitted that the petitioner is also an encroacher in the abovesaid survey number.

¶4Considering the submissions made on either side, the authorities concerned are directed to pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law regarding the removal of encroachment, after issuing notice and conducting a survey in the presence of the petitioner, the fifth respondent and all the other parties and thereafter, the authority concerned is directed to take necessary action for removal of the encroachment, after affording sufficient opportunity of personal hearing to all the parties concerned and by following due process of law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶5With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. [D.K.K.,J.] [R.V.,J.]

01.02.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes ps To

1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Tuticorin District.

2.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Ottapidaram Taluk, Tuticorin District.

3.The Block Development Officer, Ottapidaram Panchayath Union, Tuticorin District.

4.The President, Eppoduvenran Village Panchayat, Ottapidaram Taluk, Tuticorin District. W.P(MD)No.1889eofe2023 D. KRISHNAKUMAR ,J. and R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J. ps DATED : 01.02.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.02.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR T.Annasamy ... Petitioner vs. 1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Tuticorin District. 2.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Ottapidaram Taluk, Tuticorin District. 3.The Block Development Officer, Ottapidaram Panchayath Union, Tuticorin District. 4.The President, Eppoduvenran Village Panchayat, Ottapidaram Taluk, Tuticorin District. 5.Muthu Lakshmi ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 herein to take necessary action for removal of the encroachments made by the fifth respondent in the public way comprised in Survey No.537/29 situated at Eppodumvenran Village, Ottapidaram Taluk, Tuticorin District by considering the petitioner's representation, dated 19.09.2022. For Petitioner : M/S.P.Banuprasath For Respondents : Mr.M.Sarangan Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.