VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Ponsikamony R v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 January 2026
Bench
K. Surenderauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 1994/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow K. Surender

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second and third respondents to issue patta based on the order passed by the second respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka. No.J3/20/2025 dated 20.06.2025 within the time frame fixed by this Court.

¶2With the consent of the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶3The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner belongs to a Scheduled Caste community. The property comprised in Survey No. 16/4A2, situated at Kalkurumpothai Colony, Thamaraikulam Village, Agastheeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari District, was allotted to a landless person belonging to the Scheduled Caste community. Page No. 2 of 6

¶4The petitioner has been in possession and enjoyment of the said property for several years. The petitioner made a representation dated

05.06.2023 during the grievance day to the first respondent seeking issuance of patta.

¶5Thereafter, the second respondent passed an order for issuance of patta in favour of the petitioner vide proceedings in Na.Ka. No.J3/61/2024 dated 04.10.2024. However, the patta has not been issued till date.

¶6Once again, the petitioner made a representation dated

26.05.2025 during the grievance day to the first respondent, which was forwarded to the second respondent. The second respondent again passed an order for issuance of patta vide proceedings in Na.Ka. No.J3/20/2025 dated 20.06.2025. Even thereafter, the patta has not been issued. Therefore, the petitioner has been constrained to file the present Writ Petition.

¶7The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, on instructions, would submit that the petitioner's request Page No. 3 of 6 would be considered and appropriate orders would be passed by the third respondent within a period of sixteen weeks.

¶8Recording the above submission and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the third respondent to consider the petitioner's request for issuance of patta and pass appropriate orders on its merits and in accordance with law and within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The third respondent is also directed to provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, before passing any order. There shall be no order as to costs. [K.SURENDER, J.]

28.01.2026 JEN Index : Yes / No To

1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari, Page No. 4 of 6

2.The District Adi-Dravidar and Tribals Welfare Officer, O/o. The District Adi-Dravidar and Tribals Welfare Officer,

3.The Special Tahsildar (Adi-Dravidar Welfare Department), Office of the Special Tahsildar, Nagercoil. Page No. 5 of 6 K.SURENDER

, J.

JEN

28.01.2026 Page No. 6 of 6

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER R.Ponsikamony ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari, 2.The District Adi-Dravidar and Tribals Welfare Officer, O/o. The District Adi-Dravidar and Tribals Welfare Officer, 3.The Special Tahsildar (Adi-Dravidar Welfare Department), Office of the Special Tahsildar, Nagercoil. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second and third respondents to issue patta based on the order passed by the second respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka. No.J3/20/2025 dated 20.06.2025 within the time frame fixed by this Court. Page No. 1 of 6 For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prithviraj For Respondents : Mr.P.Subbaraja Special Government Pleader *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.