VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Arulmani .R v. The District Collector

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
15 June 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor, B.Pugalendhi
Case no.
WP(MD) 2274/2023

Judgment

O R D E R Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2We are more than satisfied that the water channel runs through old survey No.80/2 Part. Thiru.Saravanan, local Village Administrative Officer is present in person. He states that even as on date it is still running. There is nothing on record to show that the water channel has 3 W.P.(MD)NO.2274 OF 2023 been encroached by the sixth respondent herein. No further direction is required.

¶3This writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) & (B.PUGALENDHI, J.) 15th JUNE 2023

NCS : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PMU To:

¶1The District Collector, Collectorate, Madurai.

¶2The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶3The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thirumanagalam Taluk, Madurai District.

¶4The Tahsildar, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai. 4 W.P.(MD)NO.2274 OF 2023

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND

B.PUGALENDHI, J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.2274 of 2023

15.06.2023 5 W.P.(MD)NO.2274 OF 2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

1 W.P.(MD)NO.2274 OF 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P.(MD)No.2274 of 2023 AND W.M.P.(MD)No.2056 of 2023 R.Arulmani ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector, Collectorate, Madurai. 2. The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thirumanagalam Taluk, Madurai District. 4. The Tahsildar, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai. 5. The President, Karisalpatti Village Panchayat, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District. 2 W.P.(MD)NO.2274 OF 2023 6. Muthupandi ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent herein to remove all obstruction available in the water canal in S.No. 80 and clear the Varathukkal including all encroachment made by the 5th and 6th respondents by considering the petitioner's representation dated 27.12.2022 within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.K.Samy For R-1 to R-4 : Mr.K.Balasubramani, Special Government Pleader. For R-6 : Mr.J.Barathan For R-5 : No appearance. * * *

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.